By Chris Ojow
The highest Court in the land made a
land mark Judgement by detaching
itselves from propaganda, Malice,
witch-hunt, character assassination and
reputation destruction by reinstating a
respectable Kenyan High Court Judge back
to work from baseless wild destructive
allegations geared to ruin the life of
Justice Martin Muya.
The Supreme of Kenya , the highest Court
in the land dismissed the prayers
requesting for removal of the
respectable High Court Judge Martin Muya
, dismissing the complainant that there
complaint lacks merit and do not
warrant for the removal of a
distinguished decorated Judge .
This is after the said Judge was found
to have a case to answer , where a
tribunal led by Judge Alnashir Visram
made a wild recommendation on Justice
Martin Muya over a ruling he made
touching on a successful Kenyan Bank
and a private company , temporarily
shuttering the innocent judge career .
And on Thursday 19th May year 2022 at
11am East Africa Time, Justice Martin
Muya’s Star shinned very brightly as the
light at the end of the tunnel came into
reality when Justice M. Ibrahim , S.
Wanjala, Njoki Ndungu, I. Lenaola and
William Ouko dismissed the allegations
and strongly stressed through Mohammed
Ibrahim as the lead Supreme Court bench
that delaying to deliver a ruling for a
period of five months do not amount to
suspicion of indiscipline or gross
misconduct by a respectable High Court
Judge in the Country.
“the bench said that the victim, Judge
Martin Muya was greatly misunderstood
and judged by the unprofessional public
court and convicted without mercy and
acknowledgment of his full day to day
diary , and also without mercy since
Judge Martin Muya is a human and not a
machine to work like a robot” stressed
by the five great supreme court of Kenya
Judges.
Through his Constitutional Lawyer Philip
Nyachoti conquered with the Country new
2010 Constitution in Article 168(1)(e)
, where it clearly states that: A
Tribunal’s recommendation to the
President to remove Martin Muya from
office under Article 168(7)(b) of the
Constitution is inorder , but the
accusations against the conduct of his
client do not warrant any tribunal to be
formed or any complaint to be lodged ,
forwarded to the Judges and Magistrates
employer , the Judicial Service
Commission (JSC), but understanding by a
well reasoning human , knowing very well
that sometimes work can be delayed for
several reasons .
The JSC had recommended for the removal
of the respectable High Court Judge
Martin Muya , on account that he
delayed a ruling which resulted to the
lender losing 76 million, after 14
lorries that NCBA bank was pursuing,
were auctioned by another party, over a
different debt an accusations which can
be solved through consultations and
mature understanding do not warrant to
gross misconduct as the Judges are also
guided by the law in their day to day
duty .
REPRIEVE FOR KENYAN JUDGE AS SUPREME COURT REINSTATE HIM
https://ratuniverse.com/why-does-my-rat-pee-on-me/
REPRIEVE FOR KENYAN JUDGE AS SUPREME COURT REINSTATE HIM
http://www.allescarmen.nl/food/geglaceerde-wintergroente/